New style for the basic datatypes

When doing the revision 0.7, we have been led by the following principles:

- The natural numbers (and also integers and rationals) have been
  specified in a very simple, easily readable way. Even if this
  does not follow an optimal exploitation of structure in all cases,
  readability is more essential here.

  The new specification Nat, together with its signature, can be obtained here.

  Note that Nat is now entirely self-contained, and PreNat (and
  together with it the library PreNumbers) has vanished.
  The reason is that numbers and algebra are no longer specified
  in an interleaved way.

- The  simple  and  structured datatypes,  machine numbers  and
   number representations  remain structured as they are. Compared to our
  original  numbers  (which have used a deliberate interleaving between
  numbers and algebra), they are of a different nature.
  In particular, we believe that the structuring is very natural
  here (e.g. List[Elem]) and thus can and should be shown
  to the general audience.

- Therefore, "documentation views" are a useful supplement in any case
  (and we are going to include the signatures plus some text as
  important and useful explanation of the specifications),
  but they should not replace the original specifications.
  The  flattened version  of our older  Nat specification
  shows that these are not presentable as "standalone".

- The  RelationsAndOrders  and  Algebra  libraries have been simplified
  in the following way: all the Ext-versions of the specifications
  (they contain derived operations for the respective algebraic
  structure) are moved towards the end. This makes the first part
  of these libraries more readable, while the second part can be
  skipped at first reading. Moreover, besides the (paramtererized)
  Ext-versions of the specifications, there are also non-parameterized
  versions ("Rich-xxx"), which are easily obtained from the Ext-versions.

We believe that in this way, the basic datatypes become simple enough
to be usable for the non-specialist.

We would like to obtain any comments on this proposal until

        *** end of May 2001 ***

since we are afterwards going to produce a new (hopefully nearly final)
version of the basic datatypes.


Back to the Bremen CoFI Homepage
Till Mossakowski  last update May 9, 2001.